Archive for May, 2004

Lots of random stuff…

Sunday, May 30th, 2004

It’s been a while since I posted here so this entry contains lots of random and unrelated stuff which I’ve been wanting to post for a while.

First thing is all this fuss about something Richard Stallman said about AIDS in Africa when talking about software patents in London last week. The LUGRadio guys also talked about this in this this week’s episode. Here’s the quote stolen from The Register:

This won’t be the end of free software, he says. But it will kill off much of the community. “Sure there’ll still be some of us left,” Stallman noted. “But that’s like saying its OK if millions of Africans dies of AIDS because there are loads of Africans left.”

So what’s the big deal? He’s trying to make a point about the affect software patents are likely to have on the free software community and at the same time get across that software patents are as big a deal to free software as AIDS is to Africa. OK, so maybe it wasn’t the best choice of analogy, but I hardly think its worth all the fuss that’s being made over it. People should be listening to what he is saying rather than getting wrapped up in how he is saying it.

So Big Brother 5 started on Friday. And yes I am sad enough to watch it. But I really think they’ve gone too far this time. They’ve thrown together a bizaire collection of people: a homophobic asylum seeker, two gay men, a lesbian, a transsexual and some of the most irritating people on the planet. All they need is for the lesbian to have the transsexual’s baby and it’ll be just like a (very) bad soap. I think this series will either make or irreparably break Big Brother…

I’ve just bought myself a new MP3 player to replace my aging parallel port model which requires some nasty Windows-only software running under WINE. I’m replacing it with an IOPS MFP-350 which plays OGG, works under Linux, has an FM radio and has an OLED display which should be interesting. I’ve actually ordered it direct from the main Korean reseller as it’s still significantly cheaper than buying from somewhere in the UK. Rip-off Britain strikes again.

I’ve been looking through my website referrer logs recently and continue to be impressed by the high Google rankings I get for certain search terms. Search for “CD copy prevention” and I’m currently the 5th result. Search for “party election broadcast” and I’m the 4th result. Search for “abolish exams” and I’m (again) the 4th result. If you restrict results to the UK for some of those search terms, I’m sometimes the 1st result (wow!).
Incidentally I get the impression (from my referrers) that there’s some debate going on in China or somewhere like that about abolishing exams, which is an idea I’ve suggested before. Perhaps not all of my ideas are complete rubbish after all?

One last thing. I’m currently looking for somewhere to do a networking-related industrial placement as part of my degree, starting from next summer. So if anyone has any suggestions for good places to work then please either leave a comment here or e-mail me. Cheers!

The mysterious ways of the EuroVision

Saturday, May 15th, 2004

Well the EuroVision has finished. Unfortunately I missed all the performances but managed to see most of the voting. I must say that Ukraines’s winning entry was pretty crappy. I can’t imagine why it won (but then I didn’t see any of the other performances…).

Of course the voting was just ridiculous as usual. To quote Terry Wogan “somebody perhaps will explain why we’re even bothering”. But what can you do about political voting? The same countries always vote for the same countries and we’re no different. Perhaps they could stop countries voting for any countries they share a border with? But even that won’t stop countries NOT voting for countries they don’t like.

I think the main problem for us is that we don’t have as many friends as we used to (especially since Iraq)., so we basically have no chance of winning whatever we do.

Perhaps they could let a few Commonwealth countries into the EBU to even it up a bit…

Party Election Broadcasts

Friday, May 14th, 2004

This is a party election broadcast by the lets-all-fight-like-children-and-avoid-actually-commenting-on-any-real-issues party.

So I’ve seen the election broadcasts by Labour, The Conservatives, The Lib Dems, UKIP and The Green Party. And I’m seriously beginning to wonder why people vote for the big three parties. Here’s what I thought of each broadcast (my political orientation being cast aside for the moment).

The Labour broadcast was funny. Not only funny, but also rather correct with regards to the comments they made about the Tories. But so what? So they’ve spent a while slagging off the Tories and making people laugh – while managing to completely avoid talking about any of the critical election issues. What I think is also interesting (as an ex media student) is that they were criticising things the Tories have done in the past, without actually saying that they would have done anything different, or will do anything different if they stay in power. The audience assume that Labour wouldn’t do anything stupid like the Tories did, but they don’t actually say that, do they? They also seem to have forgotten that these are local and EU elections, not a general election and completely avoided saying anything about local issues.
Labour should be focusing on saying what they will do if they win local or EU seats, not on trying to scare people into not voting for the Tories.

So now onto the Conservatives. Again, rather like Labour’s broadcast, they focused on the questionable things Labour have done while in power. Again, factually correct without any useful information. Would the Tories have done any different? What will they do different if they get into power? Again they are using the assumptions of the audience against them.
They claim that Labour basically lied during their election manifesto. What’s new? Isn’t that the norm for any government?
Again, they have also avoided any local issues. This should not be a popularity contest, but an opportunity for the public to decide who will actually provide the best local services and EU representation.
This slagging match between Labour and the Tories is becoming rather tiring. They need to stop being so bloody childish and get on with running the country. Although I must admit that it makes “Prime Ministers’ Questions” (shown on BBC Parliament) one of the funniest “reality” shows on TV!

Anyway, let’s move on the the Lib Dems. I have to be perfectly honest here: I watched their broadcast and took absolutely nothing away from it. I can’t even remember it. And if I can’t remember it, it can’t have been very good can it? It may have been filled with useful election material but if I can’t remember it, it can’t have been very interesting. So sorry, I can’t comment on it.

So on to UKIP. I thought this was a very good broadcast. It was filled with good election material on UKIP’s views and I found it quite insightful. They’d clearly done their research on the facts, focusing on material which is very relevant at the moment (namely the expanding membership of the EU and immigration) and it was all presented well. It was also very interesting that they included quotes from (probably) a UKIP representative from every constituency. This allows they audience to actually see something relevant to them and I think this will make a difference to people who think politics has no effect on them. A big part of this election is local issues of course – something so far ignored by the other parties.
Based on this broadcast, I think UKIP are going to do well in this election.

And finally, The Green Party. I watched this broadcast yesterday and was quite impressed. Not only is it funny, but it also tackles important issues both nationally and locally. It’s also very nice to see that the Greens are not only focusing on traditional green issues, but also on other important issues which affect everyone. The most memorable issues in the broadcast were Iraq, public transport and the Euro. These are all issues which are likely to win the Green Party votes.

Based purely on these broadcasts, I would say that this election should be between UKIP and The Green Party. But naturally it will be between Labour and the Conservatives as per usual. The two biggest parties have done absolutely nothing to convince me to vote for them. In fact if anything, they’ve convinced me NOT to vote for them by doing nothing other than slagging each other off.

I have to wonder why anyone votes for Labour or The Conservatives at all.

Site up and down

Tuesday, May 11th, 2004

My apologies to anyone who has tried to access my site over the last four days or so. It has been up and down like a yo-yo (more down than up) due to a hard disk which is steadily failing.

But I’m 300 miles away so can’t replace it until next week… At the moment I’m just getting someone to reboot it and let it fsck itself every time it falls over. Data is gradually going to the bit bucket as well but it is all backed up.

And the next person who tells me that SCSI is more reliable than IDE will find themselves being clubbed around the head with the aforementioned failing drive.

Why exams should be abolished

Monday, May 10th, 2004

I think it’s time I proved that I’m not a total geek, and started writing some stuff not related to technology. So here is the first of many non-geeky posts…

As someone who has been through the school system up to A-Level and is now starting a degree, I think I’m well qualified to talk about what’s wrong with the educational system – more so than the idiots in the government who suggest one daft reform after another.

I have a piece of paper which says that I passed GCSE history. But what does it actually mean now? I could write everything I know about the Industrial Revolution and the development of medicine throughout history in a few paragraphs but I supposedly learnt all of this. So to answer my own question, that piece of paper proves nothing. It proves that I once passed a short-term memory test on a particular subject. What use is that?

Everybody knows that if you learn something but never use it, you forget it.

So what is the answer? I believe that the current way of assessing students is completely wrong. We are told facts in the classroom, remember them for a while, forget them, revise them shortly before the exam, then forget them again.
The answer, I believe, is to completely abolish exams. Rather than having an exam at the end of a course or academic year, there should be a series of much shorter tests throughout the course. Each test should cover parts of every topic taught so far in the course. Then the student can’t get away with just revising everything before the final exam, but must revise everything they’ve learnt so far before each short test. This should mean that things are committed to long-term rather than short-term memory and may actually give some value to academic qualifications. Not to mention a huge reduction to stress levels, which can’t be a bad thing.

Oh well. Just my 2p. I’m off to prepare for an exam tomorrow…