Archive for November, 2004

Linux Movie Production & Doom III

Monday, November 29th, 2004

I went over to Sheffield on Saturday for a talk entitled “Linux at the Movies” by Robin Rowe, lead developer of CinePaint who had come over from Hollywood. The meeting was organised by ShefLUG (sponsored by the IEE, Digital South Yorkshire and the NTI West Yorkshire) who can’t seem to stop themselves from organising great events.
It was the most interesting talk I’ve ever been to. He started by talking about how Linux came to be adopted by the major movie studios (they migrated from SGI and IRIX) and the software they use for each stage in the production process. They seem to mainly use software developed in-house but also make use of CinePaint (which they also funded the development of and continue to contribute to – this was a suprise). He also talked about how the various special effects are done and showed several movie clips demonstrating this – it wasn’t related to Linux specifically, but it was very interesting none-the-less. What was especially interested was what he said about DVDs: basically the movie companies don’t really like them because they are better quality. While you wouldn’t notice a slight camera shake in the cinema due to the quality of the film, you would notice it on DVD so all the little imperfections stand out.
So in summary, it was great! And as usual all it cost was my train fare from Manchester to Sheffield.

I’ve also recently got myself a copy of Doom III (for Linux, of course) and I must admit that I’ve got rather mixed feelings about it. The gameplay seems to be Half Life meets Unreal Tournament and doesn’t really offer anything new. The graphics on the other hand are great, but my P4 3.06GHz with 1GB of RAM and a GeForce FX Go 5200 just can’t cope with changing the quality from the lowest setting which I think is absolutely appalling, especially since processors only go 600MHz faster than what I’ve got…

A proper look at Ubuntu

Thursday, November 18th, 2004

Well I mentioned a week or so ago that I was going to give the much-hyped Ubuntu a go.

I must say that I’m thoroughly unimpressed. The installation process is completely unremarkable and they’ve still got a long way to go if they want it to be not just usable, but understandable by someone who is new to Linux. A new user may be able to get by, but unless they actually understand what’s happening and what the various options are actually for then they’re not going to have any confidence and will end up going back to a system they do understand.
The system itself seems to offer absolutely nothing you couldn’t get from any other Linux distro with a bog standard Gnome install. I’m keen to be proved wrong, but at the moment I just don’t see what all the hype is about.

As a KDE user I was greatful for the opportunity to see where Gnome is at the moment. I used to use Ximian Gnome (which doesn’t seem to exist anymore) many moons ago and it was so much better than KDE. But KDE quickly caught up and got way ahead and I dumped Gnome and so far haven’t looked back. But having looked at it recently I like the way the hardware detection and configuration is going and if anything is going to make me switch, this will be it. My main problem with Gnome is that I really don’t like the look and feel of the system. I can’t really explain why, but I just don’t like it. I do in fact have Gnome installed alongside KDE on my Debian install but I must admit to never having run it. Perhaps I will spend the required time making it look reasonable and see if I could see myself using it day-to-day.

I love spam!!!

Wednesday, November 10th, 2004

Yes, that’s right, I love spam. Well, one variety of spam anyway: the British variety.

Today I received a spam e-mail to an account I use for business. This address is posted in one place on the Internet AS AN IMAGE so the bastard has obviously made a specific effort to obtain the address. So why do I like this kind of spam? Well, because the sender is in the UK I can report the e-mail to his UK ISP and hosting provider for the site he’s spamvertising (Nildram and NTL respectively) and know that they will actually take action! So I can now sit in smugness knowing that the ISPs will at the very least give them a severe bollocking and at best disable their e-mail and web hosting without any prior warning. Yes yes yes!
Then of course there’s the fact that sending unsolicited e-mail is illegal under UK law. So I can also complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office who are responsible for enforcing the relevant law and get them into even more trouble. Yes!

Oh, and my day may get even better if I start feeling BOFH-like this afternoon and decide to use the phone number provided on the spammer’s mail (020 7649 9712). I can also post the spammer’s e-mail address on the Internet ensuring it will be harvested (andrew.mogridge@webwindows.co.uk).

Ahhhhhhh.

Firefox!!!

Tuesday, November 9th, 2004

So Firefox 1.0 was finally released today :-)
But it’s not in Debian yet :-(

I’ve been using the Mozilla suite but have decided to make the switch to Firefox today. The main reason is that it was so damm easy. I apt-got Firefox, ran it, it imported absolutely everything from my Mozilla profile automatically. Settings, cookies, saved passwords and bookmarks. Cool.
Another one of my main reasons for switching is that Firefox’s popularity seems to have caused a significant slow-down in the development of the Mozilla suite. At the moment every Mozilla site is if not completely down from the high load, taking a year to respond to a request but that’s a minor annoyance. But you’d think they would predict this kind of load, and plan to avoid it? If it’s bad now, wait until the New York Times ad is published….

I really must give Ubuntu (what a stupid name) a try sometime. There’s been a lot of hype about it so I’d better fire up VMWare and see what all the fuss is about. In fact I’ll grab the ISO now…

The US Elections

Tuesday, November 2nd, 2004

What I’ve found very interesting in the run-up to the US presidential elections is how every official or mainstream poll is showing Kerry and Bush as level, whereas every unofficial poll I’ve seen (like Slashdot for example) shows Kerry as being way out ahead.

Sure, none of these polls are scientific or foolproof, but after the circus that happened last time, people could be forgiven for having the word "conspiracy" spring to mind…

It’s worrying to think about how many of America’s voters are actually making a fully informed decision about who to vote for, and how many are simply surrendering to and believing all the campaign spam (I think that’s a appropriate word) spread across every single area of the media. I suspect the number is worrying low. It’s now that I am thankful that the British election process is different in almost every way. Lib Dem MP Richard Allan blogged about how US politics is different from European politics and about how he hopes they don’t ever allow political advertising on television in the UK. I agree 100% because not only would it bombard people so much that they’ll get sick of the whole thing and not bother voting, but also it disadvantages smaller parties who can’t afford expensive advertising.

At least this time the elections are being monitored to ensure that they are fair. Note that the organisation doing the monitoring is used to monitoring elections in third-world dictatorships and similar situations where there is a high risk of corruption. Enough said I think.

If I was an American, I sure as hell wouldn’t be voting for Bush. Actually I wouldn’t vote for either Bush or Kerry, but I do find it hard to understand why anyone would vote for Bush after seeing his ability to escalate any situation and make it 10 times worse.

God Bless America. She needs all the help she can get.